|
Men As Learners
and Elders (M.A.L.Es)
|
|
|
On
the Edge of the Inside: The Prophetic Position One
is struck in the study of saints, angels, and gods by a pattern that seems
quaint and harmless, yet it is so common that I know there must be a deeper
meaning. There always seem to be guardians and spirits of doors, bridges,
exits, and entranceways. I saw it all over Asia, read about in Egypt and
Mesopotamia, and am familiar with it in Greek mythology, guardian angels, and
Catholic saints like St. John Nepomuk, St. Christopher, and even St. Peter. What
is going on here? Ancients
knew that you need guidance, patronage, and protection as you move from one
place or state to another, whenever you cross a bridge. You had better
know what you are doing when you leave one group or place to join another.
There are boundary issues that must be dealt with, dues and respects that must
be paid, and you better not enter or leave anything until you know what you are
doing. “Don’t move your boundary markers before you know the price and
you have the right inspiration.” Even Charon who ferried the dead Greeks
across the River Styx into Hades, would not do it unless the dead had been
properly buried and they carried his payment in their mouths. The
edge of things is a liminal space – a very sacred place where guardian angels
are especially available and needed. The edge is a holy place, or as the Celts
called it, “a thin place” and you have to be taught how to live there.
To take your position on the spiritual edge of things is to learn how to move
safely in and out, back and forth, across and return. It is a prophetic
position, not a rebellious or antisocial one. When you live on the edge of
anything with respect and honor, you are in a very auspicious position.
You are free from its central seductions, but also free to hear its core message
in very new and creative ways. When you are at the center of something,
you usually confuse the essentials with the non-essentials, and get tied down by
trivia, loyalty tests, and job security. Not much truth can happen
there. To
live on the edge of the inside is different than being an insider, a “company
man,” or a dues paying member. Yes, you have learned the rules and you
understand and honor the system as far as it goes, but you do not need to
protect it, defend it, or promote it. It has served its initial and helpful
function. You have learned the rules well enough to know how to “break
the rules” without really breaking them at all. “Not to abolish the
law but to complete it” as Jesus rightly puts it (Matthew 5:17). A
doorkeeper must love both the inside and the outside of his or her group, and
know how to move between these two loves. I
am convinced that when Jesus sent his first disciples on the road to preach to
“all the nations” (Matthew and Luke) and to “all creation” (Mark), he
was also training them to risk leaving their own security systems and yet to be
gatekeepers for them. He told them to leave the home office and connect
with other worlds. This becomes even clearer in his instruction for them
“not to take any baggage” and to submit to the hospitality and even the
hostility of others. Jesus says the same of himself in John’s Gospel
(10:7) where he calls himself “the gate” where people “will go freely in
and out, and be sure of finding pasture” (10:9). What an amazing
permission! He sees himself more as a place of entrance and exit than a
place of settlement. Funny that we always noticed the “in” but never
the “out”! There is a place and time for being outside, or you never
really understand or appreciate the inside. A gatekeeper stewards the
doorway in both directions, and knows the right motivation and timing for both.
Like a good shepherd, s/he leads to the best pasture at the best time. I
remember when a Bishop once told me: “Many of the best Catholics in my
diocese left the church for a while—and then came back for adult and right
reasons.” One does not hear that kind of wisdom much anymore. Today it
is all about being a consummate insider, which now is called “orthodoxy.”
Jesus clearly was much more concerned with journey, integrity, and what we would
call “ortho-praxy” (correct practice) more than mere correct ideas or
correct group. Jesus
was not teaching or maintaining any purity system (which is to say a
“belonging system”), but Jesus used everything, even people’s
mistakes/”impurity”, to bring them to God! Good news for everybody, if
they are honest. He was into a process of transformation more than a
belonging system. For example, he says lovingly to an inquisitive scribe:
“You are not far from the kingdom of God” (Mark 12:34) – affirming his
particular stage on the journey, without telling him to go all the way right
now. He wanted searchers more than settlers, prophets more than priests,
honest journeys more than gatherings of the so called healthy. He had been
taught well by his own Jewish exodus and exile. All
of these situations are describing the unique and rare position of a Biblical
prophet—he or she is always on the edge of the inside. Not an outsider
throwing rocks, not a comfortable insider who defends the status quo, but one
who lives precariously with two perspectives held tightly together—the
faithful insider and the critical outsider at the same time. Not ensconced
safely inside, but not so far outside as to lose compassion or understanding.
Like a carpenter’s level, the prophet has to balance the small bubble in the
glass between here and there, between yes and no, between loyalty and critique.
The prophet must hold these perspectives in a loving and necessary creative
tension. It is a unique kind of seeing and living, which will largely
leave the prophet with “nowhere to lay his head” while easily meriting the
“hatred of all” – who have invariably taken sides in opposing groups (Luke
21:16-17). The prophet speaks for God, and almost no one else, it seems. People
inside of belonging systems are very threatened by those who are not within that
group. They are threatened by anyone who has found their citizenship in
places they cannot control. Christians called this place “the kingdom of
heaven”. When one has found their treasure elsewhere, and is utterly grounded
in the passion and pathos of a transcendent God (to use Walter Brueggemann’s
magnificent words), they are both indestructible and uncontrollable by worldly
systems. Without it, they will seek their treasure and payoffs inside of
each passing kingdom. If you look at some who have served the prophetic role in modern times, like Martin Luther King, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Dorothy Day, John XXIII, Simone Weil, and Oscar Romero, you will notice that they all hold this exact position. They tend to be, each in their own way, orthodox, conservative, traditional clergy, intellectuals, or believers, but that very authentic inner experience and membership allows them to utterly critique the very systems that they are a part of. You might say that their enlightened actions clarified what our mere belief systems really mean. These prophets critiqued Christianity by the very values that they learned from Christianity. Every one of these men and women was marginalized, fought, excluded, persecuted, or even killed by the illusions that they exposed and the systems they tried to reform. It is the structural fate of a prophet. You can only truly unlock systems from within, but then you are invariably locked out. When
you live on the edge of the inside, you will almost wish you were outside.
Then you are merely an enemy, a pagan, a persona non grata, and can largely be
ignored or written off. But if you are both inside and outside, you
are the ultimate threat, the ultimate reformer, and the ultimate invitation. Return to: Return to: |
Last modified: April 13, 2008 |